The Effectiveness of Send-a-problem Technique to Teach Writing in the Eighth Grade of SMPN 2 Banyumas

An Experimental Research

  • Tri Pujiani Universitas Harapan Bangsa
  • Ngadiso Ngadiso Sebelas Maret University
  • Dewi Rochsantiningsih Sebelas Maret University
Keywords: send-a-problem, guided writing, creativity, experimental

Abstract

Send-A-Problem is one of cooperative learning techniques in which the students are involved in a discussion to solve a problem.  It allows the students to practice together and learn from each other, so it is very effective to encourage the students’ self-esteem and creativity. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of Send-A-Problem technique for teaching writing of junior high school students. This experimental study was conducted at a Junior High School in Banyumas, in February 2012-March 2015. The samples of the study were taken by using cluster random sampling. The samples are two classes; those are VIIIE which was treated as experimental class taught by using Send-A-Problem and VIIIF which was treated as control class taught using by Guided Writing. Each of them consists of 30 students. The data was taken from writing test. The data was analyzed by using descriptive statistics and independent t-test. The result shows that (1) Send-A-Problem is more effective than Guided Writing for teaching writing of Junior High School. In conclusion, Send-A-Problem is an effective technique to teach writing for Junior High School students.

References

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2004. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara
Brown, H. Douglas. 2001. Teaching by Principle: an Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Brown. 2011. What Makes Writing so Important. Available at www. marquette.edu Downloaded on February 2nd, 2012
Byrne, Donn. 1997. Teaching Writing Skills. New York: Longman.
De Cecco, John P. and Crawford, William R. 1974. The Psychology of Learning and Instruction. New York: Prentice Hall International, Inc.
Fasko Jr, Daniel. 2001. Creativity Research Journal: Education and Creativity. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Vol. 13 Nos. 3 & 4, 317-327
Henson, Kenneth T. & Eller, Ben F. 1999. Educational Psychology for Effective Teaching. New York: Wadsworth Publishing Company
Hicyilmaz. 2005. Cooperative Learning. Available at www. yde.yildiz.edu.tr Downloaded on February 2nd, 2012
O’Malley, J. Michael and Pierce, Lorraine Valdez. 1996. Authentic Assessment for English Language Learners. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company
Olson, Miles C., Daniel R. Kirby, Gale Douglas Hulme.1982. The Writing Process. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Inc.
Raimes, Ann. 1983. Techniques in Teaching Writing. New York: Ocford University Press
Richard, Jack C. and Renandya, Willy A. 2002. Methodology Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Rockler, Michael J. 1988. Innovative Teaching Strategies. Scottscdale: Gorsuch Scarisbrick, Publisher
Utami Munandar. 1988a. Kreativitas Sepanjang Masa. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka
Wang, Amber Yayin. 2011. ELSEVIER: Exploring the Relationship of Creative Thinking to Reading and Writing. Vol. 7 38-47
2011. Kebijakan Pemerintah dalam Dunia Pendidikan. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional
Published
2019-12-13
Section
Articles