PENERAPAN DOKTRIN FOREIGN EQUIVALENTS PADA PENDAFTARAN MEREK DAGANG DI INDONESIA

Maya Ruhtiani

doi:10.35960/j-lee.v5i1.1110

Authors

Maya Ruhtiani

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35960/j-lee.v5i1.1110

Keywords:

doctrine, foreign equivalents, registration, trademarks

Abstract

Trademark registration is very important for businesses so that the trademark that has been built is not imitated by others, but in reality, the registration of trademarks in the Directorate General of Intellectual Property does not rule out the possibility of disputes caused by the registration of trademarks that have similarities with other trademarks or even have similarities in meaning with previously registered trademarks. This research discusses the application of the doctrine of foreign equivalents associated with trademark registration in Indonesia which aims to be a solution when there is a dispute in the trademark registration process. The research method used is normative legal research using legal materials relevant to trademark registration in Indonesia. The results showed that the concept of the doctrine of foreign equivalents is done by translating a trademark or service mark into English before the mark is registered. It is intended that the registered trademark can be identified whether the trademark is a generic trademark or included in the words of public property or there is a resemblance to a previously registered trademark. In addition, the doctrine of foreign equivalents has not been applied in Indonesia, it can be proven by the existence of two different court decisions related to trademark registration associated with the concept of foreign doctrine.

References

Budi, D. B. S., Maulana, R., & Fitriyah, H. (2019). Sistem Deteksi Gejala Hipoksia Berdasarkan Saturasi Oksigen Dengan Detak Jantung Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy Berbasis Arduino. Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer., 3(2), 1925–1933.
Budi Santoso. (2009). Pengantar Hki Dan Audit Hki Untuk Perusahaan. Pustaka Magister.
Chandra Gita Dewi. (2013). Merek Tidak Terdaftar Dan Perlindungan Hukumnya Di Indonesia. Jurnal Varia Peradilan, 1(1), 77.
Elizabeth J. Rest. (2006). Lost In Translation: A Critical Examination Of Conflicting Decisions Applying The Doctrine of Foreign Euivalents," The Trademark Reporter, Association. Official Journal of International Trademark Association, 96(6).
Iswi Hariyani. (2010). Prosedur Mengurus Haki Yang Benar. Pustaka Yustisia.
Michael Antonucci. (n.d.). United States: TTAB: Doctrine Of Foreign Equivalents Not Applicable To Personal Names. Mondaq. https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/trademark
Muhammad Djumhana dan R. Djubaedillah. (2013). Hak Milik Intelektual (Sejarah,Teori, dan Prakteknya Di Indonesia). PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
Ni Ketut Supasti Dharmawan. (2016). Buku Ajar Hak Kekayaan intelektual (HKI). Deepublish.
Nur Aisyah. (2017). Skripsi Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepemilikan Merek Dagang Good Day Antara Perusahaan Sebagai Badan Hukum Dengan Direktur Sebagai Orang Pribadi.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2013). Penelitian Hukum (edisi revisi). Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Rahmi Jened Parida Nasution. (2013). Interface Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual Dan Hukum Persaingan (Penyalahgunaan Hki). PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Suratman dan H. Philips Dillah. (2013). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Alfabeda.
Susy Tan, M. I. F. R. & A. G. (2022). APPLICATION OF THE DOCTRINE OF FOREIGN EQUIVALENTS IN THE CASE OF BRANDS IN INDONESIA (CASE STUDY OF VERDICT NUMBER 118 PK/PDT.SUS-HKI/2014). The Seybold Report, 17(11), 1412–1438. https://seyboldreport.org/article_overview?id=MTEyMDIyMDMyNTA5NTY0Nzgx
William T. Ralston. (2007). Foreign Equivalents of the U.S. Doctrine of Equivalents: We ’ re Playing in the Same Key but It’ s Not Quite Harmony. Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property, 6(2).