Analisis Usability Aplikasi Perpustakaan Nasional Melalui Pendekatan Heuristic Evaluation Berbasis Human Computer Interaction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35960/ikomti.v6i2.1851Keywords:
Human Computer Interaction, Heuristic Evaluation, Usability, IPUSNASAbstract
Rapid advancements in technology have driven the emergence of various digital applications, including digital libraries. One such application is iPusnas, which serves as a digital literacy platform among users. Based on user reviews of the Play Store, many users have reported issues such as the app’s slow responsiveness and non-functional filters, such as the inability to sort alphabetically. These problems indicate a potential deficiency in the usability of an application. Therefore, a usability evaluation is needed to determine the extent to which iPusnas adhere to the principles of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). The method employed is Jakob Nielsen’s Heuristic Evaluation, which assesses ten usability principles, including consistency, error prevention, and minimalist design. The evaluation was conducted by five internal evaluators, using a severity rating scale ranging from 0 to 4. The results show that iPusnas continue to experience usability issues in several areas, particularly in the principles of Help and Documentation (4.00), Flexibility and Efficiency of Use (3.33), and Visibility of System Status (3.13). The principle of Error Prevention received the lowest severity score (1.20), suggesting that it functions relatively well. This study underscores the effectiveness of multi-evaluator heuristic evaluation in identifying application issues, and serves as a foundation for future improvements aimed at enhancing user satisfaction.
References
[1] A. Septiani and I. Budi, “Klasifikasi Ulasan Pengguna Aplikasi: Studi Kasus Aplikasi Ipusnas Perpustakaan Nasional Republik Indonesia (PNRI),” JIPI (Jurnal Ilm. Penelit. dan Pembelajaran Inform., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1110–1120, 2022, doi: 10.29100/jipi.v7i4.3216.
[2] J. Widya Laksmi et al., “PENERAPAN DAN PELATIHAN PERPUSTAKAAN DIGITAL PADA SMK N 1 PADANG CERMIN,” J. Widya Laksmi, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 82–87, 2022, [Online]. Available: http://jurnalwidyalaksmi.com
[3] A. Azizi et al., “Usability evaluation of hospital information system according to heuristic evaluation,” Front. Heal. Informatics, vol. 10, 2021, doi: 10.30699/fhi.v10i1.271.
[4] E. S. Bekti, S. Anggraeni, and I. Sugiyarto, “Analisis Usability pada Aplikasi Universitas123 Portal Universitas dan Beasiswa Menggunakan Metode Heuristic Evaluation dan Cognitive Walkthrough,” J. Teknol. Inform. dan Komput., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1356–1370, 2023, doi: 10.37012/jtik.v9i2.1838.
[5] I. Hamidah, “Penerapan Interaksi Manusia Dan Komputer Pada Antarmuka Sistem Informasi Akademik,” J. Inform. Teknol. dan Sains, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 111–120, 2023, doi: 10.51401/jinteks.v5i1.2467.
[6] A. A. Septrarina, “Usability Evaluation Satu Sehat Application Using Heuristic Evaluation Method,” G-Tech J. Teknol. Terap., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 563–569, 2025.
[7] P. S. Rosiana, A. R. Nurhidayat, A. A. Mohsa, and A. A. Ridha, “ANALISIS APLIKASI TIKTOK BERDASARKAN PRINSIP DAN PARADIGMA INTERAKSI MANUSIA DAN KOMPUTER MENGGUNAKAN EVALUASI HEURISTIC,” JITET (Jurnal Inform. dan Tek. Elektro Ter., vol. 11, no. 3, 2023.
[8] H. Husin, S. Balafif, and E. T. Ardianto, “Analisis User Experience pada Website Dinas Pemberdayaan Masyrakat dan Desa Kabupaten Sumabawa dengan Heuristic Evaluation,” BIOS J. Teknol. Inf. dan Rekayasa Komput., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 30–39, 2023, doi: 10.37148/bios.v5i1.86.
[9] D. Putriani, A. Puspa, A. Prayogi, R. Ainul, M. S. Aviva, and A. I. Shofyana, “Analisis Kegunaan Aplikasi Ipusnas dengan Pendekatan Evaluasi Heuristik,” INOTEKS J. Inov. Ilmu Pengetahuan,Teknologi, dan Seni, vol. 8, pp. 103–112, 2024.
[10] A. N. Hikmat, “Evaluasi Desain Interface Pada Aplikasi Ipusnas Berdasarkan Teori Evaluasi Heuristik Nielsen,” Libria, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 16, 2024, doi: 10.22373/24750.
[11] A. Kaffah and I. Fardian, “Analisa aplikasi cake berdasarkan rinsip dan paradigma intraksi manuasia,” Univ. Adhirajasa Reswara Sanjaya, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 291–299, 2021.
[12] L. M. Ginting, G. Sianturi, and C. V. Panjaitan, “Perbandingan Metode Evaluasi Usability Antara Heuristic Evaluation dan Cognitive Walkthrough,” J. Manaj. Inform., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 146–157, 2021, doi: 10.34010/jamika.v11i2.5480.
[13] D. K. Wirawan and E. Maria, “Penerapan Metode Heuristic Evaluation Untuk Evaluasi User Interface Aplikasi Lazada,” J. Pendidik. Teknol. Inf., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 96–107, 2024, doi: 10.37792/jukanti.v7i1.1236.
[14] Y. Sriyeni, “Analisis Usability Aplikasi Investasi Digital Menggunakan Metode Heuristic Evaluation dan System Usability Scale,” J. Ilm. Inform. Glob., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 88–93, 2022, doi: 10.36982/jiig.v13i2.2294.
[15] Setiyadi and A. Yulianto, “Analisa Usability Test pada Website Siori Menggunakan Metode Heuristic Evaluation,” REMIK Ris. dan E-Jurnal Manaj. Inform. Komput., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1832–1844, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://www.polgan.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/remik/article/view/12916
[16] J. Nielsen, “10 Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design,” Nielsen Norman Group Web. Accessed: Jun. 09, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/
[17] J. Nielsen, “Severity Ratings for Usability Problems,” Nielsen Norman Group Web. Accessed: Jun. 09, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-to-rate-the-severity-of-usability-problems/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Randy Fachrezi Randy, Hafiz Aryanda, Muhammad Farhan, Dimas Aqila Aptanta, Arief Denis Walidein
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
