Technology and Its Impacts on EFL Students’ Critical Thinking: A Systematic Literature Review

Authors

  • Hunain Sadabillah English Language Education Study Program, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Pupung Purnawarman English Language Education Study Program, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia

Keywords:

critical thinking, educational technology, artificial intelligence, digital literacy, EFL, systematic literature review

Abstract

The prevalence of digital technology has influenced pedagogical approaches and student participation in EFL environments. As technology becomes more embedded in language learning, its impact on students' critical thinking has received attention. This systematic literature review examines the impacts of technology on students’ critical thinking and identifies pedagogical strategies that promote critical thinking through effective technology integration. Employing a PRISMA-guided review process, empirical and conceptual literature published between 2011 and 2025 was systematically collected from academic databases and analyzed using thematic synthesis. The findings reveal that technology can enhance critical thinking by fostering inquiry, collaboration, reflective learning, and access to diverse perspectives when integrated through purposeful pedagogical practices. However, an excessive reliance on digital tools, such as search engines, automated translation systems, and generative artificial intelligence, may result in cognitive passivity, reduced metacognitive regulation, weakened evaluative judgment, and diminished learner autonomy. The review further underscores the importance of teacher mediation, inquiry-based learning, and critical digital literacy in maximizing the educational benefits of technology while minimizing potential risks. The review concludes that sustaining critical thinking in EFL classrooms necessitates a balanced, pedagogically guided use of technology and the systematic development of critical digital literacy.

References

Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Assessing metacognition in an online community of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.01.005

Atkinson, D. (1997). A Critical Approach to Critical Thinking in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 31(1), 71–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3587975

Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Johnson, A. M., & Chauncey, A. D. (2010). Measuring Cognitive and Metacognitive Regulatory Processes During Hypermedia Learning: Issues and Challenges. Educational Psychologist, 45(4), 210–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2010.515934

Carr, N. (2010). The shallows : what the Internet is doing to our brains. W.W. Norton.

Chapelle, C. A. (2016). Teaching Culture in Introductory Foreign Language Textbooks. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-49599-0

Cottrell, S. (2005). Critical thinking skills: Developing effective analysis and argument. Palgrave Macmillan.

Dewey, J. (1993). How we think. D. C. Health.

Ennis, R. H. (2018). Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum. In Topoi (Number 1). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9401-4

Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. In Insight Assessment. Insight Assessment.

Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. (2015). Toward the development of a metacognition construct for communities of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.10.001

Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Lai, C., & Gu, M. (2011). Self-regulated out-of-class language learning with technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(4), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.568417

Lee, K. (2023). Artificial intelligence, academic integrity, and the future of writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 63, 101246.

Li, Y., & Hafner, C. A. (2022). Mobile-assisted vocabulary learning: Investigating receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge of Chinese EFL learners. ReCALL, 34(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344021000161

Metzger, M. J., & Flanagin, A. J. (2015). Psychological Approaches to Credibility Assessment Online. In The Handbook of the Psychology of Communication Technology (pp. 445–466). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118426456.ch20

Nicholas, D., & Ng, W. (2012). The digital consumer. Journal of Documentation, 68(2), 211–231.

OECD. (2019). Future of education and skills 2030. OECD Publishing.

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Roblyer, M. D., & Doering, A. H. (2013). Integrating Educational Technology Into Teaching (6th ed.). Pearson.

Sparrow, B., Liu, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Google Effects on Memory: Cognitive Consequences of Having Information at Our Fingertips. Science, 333(6043), 776–778. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207745

Teng, L. S., & Zhang, L. J. (2020). Empowering learners in the second/foreign language classroom: Can self-regulated learning strategies-based writing instruction make a difference? Journal of Second Language Writing, 48, 100701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100701

UNESCO. (2021). AI and education: guidance for policy-makers.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.

Wineburg, S., & McGrew, S. (2017). Lateral Reading: Reading Less and Learning More When Evaluating Digital Information. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3048994

Winne, P. H. (2017). Cognition and Metacognition within Self-Regulated Learning. In Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance (pp. 36–48). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315697048-3

Wu, W., Yen, L., & Marek, M. (2011). Using Online EFL Interaction to Increase Confidence, Motivation, and Ability. Educational Technology & Society, 14, 118–129.

Yang, Y.-T. C., & Wu, W.-C. I. (2012). Digital storytelling for enhancing student academic achievement, critical thinking, and learning motivation: A year-long experimental study. Computers & Education, 59(2), 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.012

Downloads

Published

2026-08-28

How to Cite

Hunain Sadabillah, & Pupung Purnawarman. (2026). Technology and Its Impacts on EFL Students’ Critical Thinking: A Systematic Literature Review. Proceedings of the International Conference GLOBE Forum , 1(1), 203–211. Retrieved from https://ejournal.uhb.ac.id/index.php/globeforum/article/view/2337

Issue

Section

English Language Education

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.