Impact of Eracs on Post-Caesarean Pain: A Study at Pelni Hospital, Jakarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35960/vm.v18i2.1803Keywords:
Eracs, Post-Cesarean Pain, Faster recovery, Perioperative careAbstract
Background: Data from the WHO Global Survey On Maternal And Perinatal Health shows that 46.1% of all births are performed by SC method. The WHO states that the incidence of chronic pain after SC delivery is as high as 18% and more than 80% of patients undergoing post-cesarean recovery experience pain, with approximately 75% of these patients describing moderate, severe or very severe pain. Enhanced recovery care methods are an effective way to do this. This can lead to an earlier rehabilitation and discharge process and in SC patients is known as Enhanced Recovery After Caesarian Surgery (ERACS). Research Objective: To determine the relationship between ERACS method and pain level after sectio caesarian (SC) at Pelni Hospital Jakarta in 2024. Research Methodology: Quantitative research with case control research design. The study population was all post partum mothers with SC at Pelni Hospital Jakarta in January 2024, which was 148 people and the sample obtained was 66 people. Bivariate analysis was performed with chi square test. Research Results: Univariate analysis found that most of the age is not at risk (age 20 - 35 years) as many as 54 people (81.82%), most of them have high school education, namely 40 people (60.61%), most of the mothers work, namely 36 people (55.54%). Bivariate analysis found that there is a relationship between the ERACS method and the level of pain after Sectio Caesaria (SC) at Pelni Hospital Jakarta p value (0.000) and with an OR value: 1.435 which means there is a 1.435 times chance of experiencing pain in Non Eracs labour compared to the ERACS method. Conclusion: There is a relationship between ERACS method and pain level after Sectio Caesaria (SC) at Pelni Hospital Jakarta. Suggestion: For hospitals to be able to help facilitate and prepare the necessary media for each room in organising activities.
References
Berkanis, A.T. et al. (2020) „Pengaruh Mobilisasi Dini Terhadap Intensitas Nyeri pada Pasien Post Operasi di RSUD S.K. Lerik Kupang Tahun 2018‟, CHM-K Applied Scientifics Journal, Vol. 3(1), pp. 1–8.
Corso, E. et al. (2017) „Enhanced recovery after elective caesarean : a rapid review of clinical protocols ,and an umbrella review of systematic reviews‟, pp.1–10.
Liu, Z., Du, W. and Yao, S. (2020) „Enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery : a challenge for anesthesiologists‟, 0(5).
Karyawanto, N. (2023) „Perbedaan Nyeri Post Sectio Caesaria Dengan Metode Pembiusan ERACS dan Konvensional‟.
Meng, X. et al. (2021) „The Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Cesarean Section : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies‟, 8(August).
Metasari, D. and Sianipar, B.K. (2018) „Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penurunan Nyeri Post Operasi Sectio Caesarea Di Rs. Raflessia Bengkulu‟, Journal of Nursing and Public Health, 6(1), pp. 1–7.
Mullman, L. et al. (2020) „Improved Outcomes With an Enhanced Recovery Approach to Cesarean Delivery‟, 136(4), pp. 685–691.
Murray, M., Morgan, G. and Mikhail, M. (2016) Chronic Pain Management and Perioperative Pain Management & Enchanced Outcomes. 5th edn. Edited by M. GE.Clinical Anesthesiology Lange Medical Books McGraw Hill.
Nisak, A.Z., Kusumastuti, D.A. and Munawati (2023) „Perbedaan Metode Konvensional dan ERACS Dengan Tingkat Nyeri Pada PAsien Post Sectio Caesaria‟, Jurnal Ilmu Keperawatan dan Kebidanan, 14(1), pp. 261–268.
Notoatmodjo, S. (2018) Metodologi Penelitian Kesehatan. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Padila (2014) Buku Ajar Keperawatan Maternitas. 1st edn. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika.
Pan, J., Hei, Z., Li, L., Zhu, D., Hou, H., Wu, H., Gong, C., & Zhou, S. (2020). The advantage of implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in acute pain management during elective cesarean delivery: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, 16, 369–378.
Potter, P. and Perry, A. (2015) Buku Ajar Fundamental Keperawatan: Konsep, Proses, dan Praktik. 4 volume 2. Edited by R. Komalasari. Jakarta: EGC.
Ripamonti, C. I. (2012). Pain management. Annals of Oncology, 23(SUPPL. 10).
Sartika, N. L. P. M. (2023). Hubungan Antara Nyeri Luka Post Sc Terhadap Motivasi Ibu Dalam Pemberian Asi Di Rsu Garbamed.
Sihombing, N., Saptarini, I., Sisca Kumala Putri, D., & Penelitian dan Pengembangan Upaya Kesehatan Masyarakat, P. (2017). Determinan Persalinan Sectio Caesarea Di Indonesia (Analisis Lanjut Data Riskesdas 2013). Jurnal Kesehatan Reproduksi, 8(1), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.22435/kespro.v8i1.6641.63-75
Sembiring, H. (2022) „Pengaruh Mobilisasi Dini Terhadap Intensitas Nyeri Post Sectio Cessarea (SC) Di Rumah Sakit Patar Asih Kecamatan Beringin Kabupaten Deli Serdang Tahun 2021‟, Biologi Education & Technolog, 5(2), pp. 25–30.
Tika, T.T. et al. (2022) „Metode ERACS Sebagai Program Perioperatif Pasien Operasi Caesaragus‟, Jurnal Medika Hutama, 03(02), pp. 2386–2391.
Tilley, M. (2016) „Pain Biological, Psychological or Social?‟, Jurnal of health University of Buckingham [Preprint].
Wardani, N.P. (2017) „Manajemen Nyeri Akut‟, Manajemen Nyeri Akut, pp. 57–69.
Whaley (2015) Buku Ajar keperawatan Pediatrik. 3rd edn. Jakarta: EGC.
World Health Organization (WHO) (2019) „Maternal mortality key fact‟. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/factsheets/detail/maternal-mortality.
Yiwa, O. M. (2022). Gambaran respon nyeri pasien pasca bedah sectio ceasarea setelah pemberian analgetik ketamin intravena di ruang pemulihan (recorvery room) rs karitas weitabula nusa tenggara timur.
Zumrotun Nisak, A., & Andriani Kusumastuti, D. (2023). Perbedaan Metode Konvensional Dan Eracs Dengan Tingkat Nyeri Pada Pasien Post Sectio Cesarea. In Jurnal Ilmu Keperawatan dan Kebidanan (Vol. 14, Issue 1).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tantri Wenny Sitanggang; Mira Suminar, Irma Rahmania (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Submitted paper will be firstly reviewed by the editors to determine whether the paper meet the edition theme and submission guidelines. Papers which meet the theme and the guidelines will be assigned to selected reviewers for peer-reviews. Viva Medika: Jurnal Kesehatan, Kebidanan dan Keperawatan is a double blind peer-reviewed journal which involves reviewers based on their experties relevant to the topic of the paper. Final decision of paper acceptance is solely decided by the editors according to reviewers' comment.
Plagiarism and self-plagiarism are prohibited. Viva Medika: Jurnal Kesehatan, Kebidanan dan Keperawatan uses PlagiarismCheckerX and iThenticate to scan papers for detecting plagiarism. Thus, Appropriate citation and quotation should be used
.png)
